Adhiparasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational, and Cultural Society of North America v. Township of West Pikeland, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25542 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2010).
Defendant's e-discovery expert was given access to plaintiff's computers to determine whether responsive information was still available on hard drives or servers. Plaintiff had stated that to the extent responsive email existed but had not been produced already, it had been deleted in the ordinary course of business and could not be produced.
Defendant's e-discovery expert was given access to plaintiff's computers to determine whether responsive information was still available on hard drives or servers. Plaintiff had stated that to the extent responsive email existed but had not been produced already, it had been deleted in the ordinary course of business and could not be produced.
ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Swenson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74987 (D. Minn. July 26, 2010).
Email containing draft responses of a company to a story on a television news program was privileged because the email contained implicit requests for legal advice.
Email containing draft responses of a company to a story on a television news program was privileged because the email contained implicit requests for legal advice.
Ahroner v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, 2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 525 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010).
The court struck as improper plaintiff's notice to defendant to admit that hard drives of five employees had not been preserved. After six years of discovery, admitting that hard drives had been erased would require further discovery to determine if a spoliation instruction was needed while acknowledging that information on the hard drives still was available would prompt additional discovery requests.
The court struck as improper plaintiff's notice to defendant to admit that hard drives of five employees had not been preserved. After six years of discovery, admitting that hard drives had been erased would require further discovery to determine if a spoliation instruction was needed while acknowledging that information on the hard drives still was available would prompt additional discovery requests.
Antonio v. Security Services of America, LLC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72148 (D. Md. July 16, 2010).
A magistrate judge properly inferred lost email was relevant because defendant "acted with more than gross negligence" in failing to save computers and in converting a local network onto a newer platform at the offices of defendant's parent company.
A magistrate judge properly inferred lost email was relevant because defendant "acted with more than gross negligence" in failing to save computers and in converting a local network onto a newer platform at the offices of defendant's parent company.
Aponte-Navedo v. Nalco Chemical Co., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50957 (D.P.R. May 20, 2010).
A request in an employment discrimination action for information regarding databases and computer information was overbroad because it was not restricted to defendant's Puerto Rico office where plaintiff worked.
A request in an employment discrimination action for information regarding databases and computer information was overbroad because it was not restricted to defendant's Puerto Rico office where plaintiff worked.
| << previous Page 1 of 14 next >> |
